There are a lot of impressive cellars in Bel-Air. Deep with age and rife with amazing producers that command insane amounts of money these days, but were purchased for modest amounts on their release. For example, last night I had the opportunity to open and taste 1966 Latour, 1970 Leoville Las Case, 1979 Haut Brion, 1982 Vieux Chateau Certan, and a 1980 Corton Charlemagne. And these were all from different tables!
We often have special events in our private dining room. On this particular day, we hosted a wine lunch for ten gentlemen. Flights of four wines per course were provided by a designated guest. I actually liked this approach as it afforded one the opportunity to showcase a theme or a producer from their cellar. Both cases were provided in this tasting.
We started with the St. Chamant 'Blanc de Blanc' Champagne NV from magnum. Aromas of freshly baked bread and lemon, nice minerality on the palate with baked apple and Granny Smith apple combined, a crisp mouthfeel and a ripe, fruit-filled finish driven by refreshing acidity. This was a lovely Champagne, great aperitif wine and drinking beautifully.
For the first flight, we poured a selection of Chablis from various producers and vineyards, paired with out Kampachi Crudo. The William Fevre 'Fourchaume' 2005 was good, but lacking real character. It had a reserved nose of chalk and an austere presence on the palate with some mushroominess, but all the fruit showed on the finish. Also - slightly bitter with perhaps too heavy an oak presence, especially noted on the finish. On the other hand, the Dampte 'Fourchaume' 2008 was spectacular! Very minerally aromas that had some mustiness. On the palate, lots of citrus, stone, earth, mushroom. Little to no oak presence at all. Super-long and elegant finish. This hit all the marks for me. Pie dough, chalk, apple and citrus - awesome! To follow, the Long-Depaquit 'Moutonne' 2005 by Albert Bichot was fine: green apple, lemon pith and juice - very fruit driven with nice acidity, but little earth to speak of. Some chalkiness as well, and well-integrated oak. The very disappointing Dampte 'Bougros' 2010 was a tragic follow-up to their 'Fourchaume'. California Chardonnay-like aromas and overblown oak. Hard to dig out the fruit under all this oak. Tastes like a well-made Sonoma Chard, but nothing like a Chablis. This was tragic...
Moving into the reds, we began with no less than a flight of Grand Cru red Burgundy from the 2001 vintage. 2001 was a mediocre vintage, at best, but these wines were showing beautifully. The Mongeard-Mugneret 'Clos Vougeot' 2001 had beautifully perfumed aromatics. Its core of cherry and mushroom supported an overlay of tart pomegranete and cranberry swirled with iron and a hint of campfire smoke. A noticably long finish on this as well. From the same producer, the Mongeard-Mugneret 'Grands Echezaux' 2001 was rife with mineral and earth notes: Must, tomato leaf, iron, beef, blood, sage all laying on a frame of cranberry and blackberry with hints of pepper. Supremely earth-driven and structured still. Next, the Nicolas Potel 'Romanee St. Vivant' 2001 was a disappointment after the previous two wines. The Mongeard-Mugneret Grand Crus showed such character and precision in addition to expressing what that producer had chosen to say about the vineyard site. The Potel was wishy-washy in this flight showing very little character or focus at all. At best, it was an attempt to be crowd-pleasing that ultimately resulted in a middle-of-the-road and uninteresting showing. Additionally, the oak seemed a little dominant.
And then I met the Meo-Camuzet 'Richebourg' 2001... One often speaks about those moments when Burgundy is so good that it stops you in your tracks and you realize what everyone is chasing. This was one of those moments. An exquisite example of balance, with undulating layers of seamless fruit and earth. Meat, perfectly ripe red fruits, steel, forest floor, pepper - all harmonious and elegantly intertwined. My last word from my tasting notes: "Wow". If you can find this wine, at around $700 you may think twice. I would make an argument that it is worth every penny and an experience not to be missed.
How does one follow these two flights? Move into one of California's Grand Crus and showcase a vertical of Phelps 'Insignia', of course! I poured a broken vertical of the 1980, 1990, 1992 and 1997 from Magnum. The 1980 'Insignia' was showing beautifully and in the "old style", with lots of spices, anise and some musty earth, but still holding blackberry and currant fruit. I found this even more youthful than anticipated with its present acidity and a strong spicy finish. The 1990 'Insignia' shows the signs of the modern-style, with lots of oak spice and ripe black fruits. Some leather added an interesting layer and the tannins were still strong, but with lovely acidity to keep it vibrant. Blind, I would not guess this to be as old as 21 years. The 1992 'Insignia' was not showing its best. The oak came across as sweeter and more pronounced and dominated some musty red fruit. With herbal, dusty character and too acidic on the palate, the wine comes across as austere and the fruit may potentially be falling out of this vintage. I've had varying degrees of surprise and disappointment with the 1997 'Insignia', but I was intrigued to taste it from magnum again. This was one of my better experiences with this vintage in recent years: Ripe black fruits layered with baking spices, some herbaceousness, and fig paste. The fruits are very ripe with black cherry, blackberry and currant. One of the better showings for the '97 which I still hold is sketchy and may not hold up in the long run.
The final flight was a collection of aged Malbecs. I took notes on these, but they were merely fodder to get drunk on after the previous wines, as far as I'm concerned. The highlight was a Bodegas Norton 'Finca Perdriel' 2001 that at least showed some Malbec character without being over-the-top (like a Rolland 'Yacochuya' 2001 that hosted 16% alcohol). I have nothing against Malbec, but this flight, that also included the Val de Flores 2002 and Alta Vista 'Alto' 2003 did nothing for me.
To wrap up the lunch, I poured some 1977 Warre's. 1977 is my birth vintage and I'm always excited to check in on the one style of wine I can still expect to show well from this year. The Warre's was showing exceptionally Cognac-like aromas of stewed cherry, orange rind, brown sugar and peach skin. A lip-smacking sweet attack on the palate with a red fruit core that turns Cognac-like again and expresses lovely layers of complexity. Nice stuff.
These kinds of days are the reason one does this job!
No comments:
Post a Comment